Write a short research paper by making a comparison between two “precious” design objects from the book History of Modern Design by David Raizman; Post-Modern chapter, then declare one object more post-modern than the other, and provide sources that support why you say so.

Begin with the “Introduction” where you lay the foundation: Where were objects made, when were they made, how were they made, who made them, how were objects used at the time they were made? Describe objects (identify them) in terms of what are the names of the objects, what are objects’ color, shape, size & other characteristics?

Next, in the Context, cite this scholar: Raizman’s  History of Modern Design as you refer to his text. Compare and contrast objects using additional sources outside of your textbook:

Mention whether you agree or disagree with Raizman on his description of the “precious objects” you are using for your paper, do this in the context.
List scholars and other authors in order of importance in Literature Review. On a practical basis that means that Raizman would come first, Adour would come second, Wikipedia (if used) would follow Raizman and Adour.
In your Literature Review, do not compare objects here, take a break, critique the author’s style of writing; examples at the bottom of this page.

In your Conclusion, use your own voice, what do you honestly think about your “precious objects”, which one represents post-modernism the best? End with a strong concluding statement that refers back to the “hook” in the Abstract. The hook is the attention-getting sentence that grabs your reader so they want to continue to read on…

Works Cited. It should include (but not be limited to): C. Adour’s Ashbee book because you referenced it as a guide or template for writing a comparison paper, nothing more. Also cite D. Raizman’s History of Modern Design. Cite your additional sources. Alphabetical Order for all sources.

The Purpose of your Paper is as follows:

AS a result of describing both, argue that one object may better represent post-modernism than the other and explain why; you decide and defend it by beginning with answered questions below; it is about selling me on your opinion! Support your opinion with good reasons why you say so, looking for the logic; how well can you sell your idea? Persuade me!

What is it made of?

Who designed it?

Where was it made?

What is its function?

How was it made, bending wood or a lithograph?

Why is it significant, how does it make a difference, a better quality of life?

Which object better represents the post-modernism movement, based on your detailed descriptions?