Here is the rubric: For Phase 1 of your research paper you will build on your PICOT Question and Annotated Bibliography.
Phase 1 should have the following components:
A. Background of the Problem
B. Problem Statement (PICOT Question)
C. Purpose of the Paper
D. Literature Search Strategy Employed
E. Evaluation Conclusion of the Literature
The paper should APA formatted, 3-6 pages (double spaced) long. Not included in the page count, but required, an APA formatted title page and references page.
Review the rubric to understand how you will be assessed for this assignment.
Rubric
Phase 1 rubric
Phase 1 rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle Page
10.0 pts
Excellent
The title page is correctly formatted using APA style guidelines.
6.0 pts
Beginning
The title page has 1 or more errors.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBackground of the Problem
20.0 to >15.0 pts
Excellent
Topic is clearly defined and context for research is provided. Background information is engaging and leads to a clear purpose statement. Relevance to nursing is articulated well.
15.0 to >10.0 pts
Proficient
Topic is defined and context for research is provided. Background information leads to a clear purpose statement. Relevance to nursing is articulated.
10.0 to >0 pts
Beginning
The paper presented the topic and research need.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePICOT Question
5.0 pts
Excellent
The PICOT question is clearly stated.
2.0 pts
Beginning
The PICOT question is not clearly identified.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose of the Paper
10.0 pts
Excellent
This section of the paper goes from general to specific, demonstrating the importance of topic. Two or three main discussion points of the literature review are clearly identified in the purpose statement.
7.0 pts
Proficient
This section of the paper demonstrates the importance of topic with two or three discussion points of the literature review identified in the purpose statement.
5.0 pts
Beginning
This section shows limited understanding of the research purpose. Some perspective of paper’s context is discussed. This section sets a basic context for the problem.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Search Strategy
20.0 to >15.0 pts
Excellent
Concise details are provided about article selection, including search engines, search terms, and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Number and type of articles included are clearly stated. All articles are relevant to the purpose.
15.0 to >10.0 pts
Proficient
Details are provided about the article selection, including search engines, search terms, and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Number and type of articles included are stated. Most articles are relevant to the purpose.
10.0 to >0 pts
Beginning
The article selection, including search engines, search terms, and inclusion/exclusion criteria are presented. Number and type of articles included are not stated. Most articles are relevant to the purpose.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation of the Literature
50.0 to >40.0 pts
Excellent
The paper discusses the general findings among the experts and identifies the consensus of the findings. There is an objective, balanced view from various perspectives. Each cited study is related to the topic. There is a variety of studies and attention to detail about the topic. The collection of studies are analyzed for differences and commonalities about the topic. A conclusion of the findings is clearly stated.
40.0 to >30.0 pts
Proficient
The paper discusses findings among the experts and identifies the consensus of the findings. There is an objective, balanced view from various perspectives. Each cited study is related to the topic. There is a variety of studies and attention the topic. The collection of studies have differences and commonalities noted. The conclusion of the findings is stated.
30.0 to >0 pts
Beginning
The paper discusses findings among the experts and weakly identifies the consensus of the findings. There is not an objective, balanced view from various perspectives. Cited studies do not all relate to the topic. The collection of studies have differences and commonalities noted. A weak conclusion of the findings is offered.
50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format of References
25.0 pts
Excellent
The paper is consistent in correct use of APA formatting. APA formatting is free from errors.
20.0 pts
Proficient
APA formatting throughout has 2-5 errors.
15.0 pts
Intermediate
APA formatting throughout has 6 or more errors. Inconsistent use of APA format.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Style and Grammar
Proof read the paper several times. Check and double check, looking for easy errors. Use the writing resources.
20.0 to >15.0 pts
Excellent
The paper is consistently correct in the use of the rules of grammar, usage, punctuation, and spelling. Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
15.0 pts
Intermediate
The paper contains few grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
15.0 to >0 pts
Proficient
The paper demonstrates consistent correct use of the rules of grammar, usage, punctuation and spelling with few minor errors.
20.0 pts
Total Points: 160.0
Note to writer: annotated bibliography is attached, you may add references if needed. Also attached is the PICOT question that the research article is based on. Please e-mail if you have any questions thank you.
